Pukka has mentioned Joe Manton's patent design that looks somewhat like what we are seeing here. Here is the text from page 144 and the images of The Mantons - Gunmakers that describe the patent:
Patent No. 2722 was granted on 6 July, 1803.
PATENT NO. 2722(Figure 10)
A Hammer on an improved construction for the locks of all kinds of Fowling Pieces and Small Arms.
On the margin are three views of the improvement in the hammer; A, is the part which is next the touch hole, and is hollowed out and perforated with a small hole, so as to let the air pass through, but not the powder; B, is the seat of the hammer, which is grooved or hollowed out from the perforation to the edge C, so as to let the air out of the pan, but not the powder. Now the intention of this improvement in perforating the hammer, grooving or hollowing out the seat, is to let the air out of the barrel and pan; in putting down the wadding the powder in the barrel, by the air being allowed to pass, is forced into the perforated receiver A, so that the touchhole is always full of powder, and by these means fire arms of all kinds are prevented from flashing or hanging fire. These hammers may be applied to all kind of fire arms, and may be varied in size, form, shape, and manner of perforation, grooving, or hollowing, and manner of letting the air out of the barrel and pan.
Although the specification is so brief, or perhaps because of this very fact, this patent was to lead to much litigation. Colonel Peter Hawker credited both John and Joseph Manton and also Durs Egg with producing hammers which had the desired effect, but considered that the original discovery was that of Joseph Manton. Study of the law reports makes clear that the specification as drawn up was incorrect having regard to patent law.
Here are the images from the book that show the design.
Mike