Author Topic: Wood questions  (Read 22660 times)

northmn

  • Guest
Re: Wood questions
« Reply #50 on: January 22, 2010, 10:51:16 PM »
Sucking minerals up in the base makes sense however the flame in the birch tend to ripple when split like the curl in maple.

DP

Offline TPH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Wood questions
« Reply #51 on: January 22, 2010, 11:00:15 PM »
Rolfkt, thanks for the pictures of the beautiful Scandinavian rifles and that chair is a delight! The birch you have access to is extremely good wood for gun stocks, looking at a collection of the military rifles of Finland will show that very well. Hard, dense and durable and many stocks show exceptional figure.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2010, 11:01:19 PM by TPH »
T.P. Hern

The other DWS

  • Guest
Re: Wood questions
« Reply #52 on: January 23, 2010, 01:59:42 AM »
another speculation: 
Having shot a fair amount of both historic and modern arms over the years it's pretty evident that black powder loads have a substantial difference in their recoil characteristics.  I assume its because of the different burn rate patterns.
    The significance being that perhaps the, for lack of better term, "easier recoiling" of a black powder arm (particularly in the round ball era with lighter weigh projectiles than later conical slugs) made the use of figured woods more practical for non-military (meaning non-bayonet equipped) arms.

another  question:   Has anyone noted any correlation between figured (weak-grained) wood and relatively thick-walled barrel arms like rifles or straight grained (assumed to be stronger) woods for thinner walled barrels of fowling pieces?