Thanks for all the input. You have made me aware of some other issues I had not thought of.
Guy,
I do prefer a screwed on triggerguard for this rifle. I have one of Dennis' guards which is the pinned type, but I am using a Bean style guard with screws on this one.
T,
The triggers are the DA Davis triggers that Jim Chambers sells with the tall trigger bars that have to be filed, so I should'nt have to go too deep to make the trigger engage the sear. In fact, I guess I will be filing a lot off the trigger bars (gates??).
Ken,
You are right on the precarve. Funny you mentioned a pinched wrist. I think I understand what you are talking about (smaller at the breech than at the comb?). I have seen some pics of originals that had this feature and IMO it is'nt a very flattering feature to the lines of the rifle. I have some issues with the precarved stock in the wrist area that are issues even before I consider changing the bottom line of the stock. The wrist was carved very thin to begin with and I lost a little when I inlet the tang. The precarve also arrived with some cast-off that I did not really want. I tried to cheat a little of the cast-off out of it, but I lost a little more material in the wrist. What I am saying is that some of the architecture of this stock is defined by what I had to work with and is not going to turn out exactly like I would have laid it off if I had been working from an unshaped stock blank. I'm sure an experienced builder could have done a lot more with it. I've learned some things that will help on the next one. I'll say this, she will have a very skinny wrist, especially for a .50cal rifle. Judging from where the ramrod hole is, I don't think I will have any problems with room for the trigger bars under the sear lever. The .32cal rifle I got from Curt Lyles has the same lock and triggers I am using and I don't see any way I will get the triggers as close to the lock as Curt did on that one because of the location of the ramrod hole. Thanks a lot for chiming in (all of you).
Greg