Thanks Justin. Just another shining example of the wonderful work of the English gunmakers! No one did it better, and I am a Kentucky rifled guy.
Dick
I have read that the Hawken brothers were influenced by English sporting rifles that showed up in St.Louis but other than the
sometimes large calibers, I see none of it from then or now.
Bob Roller
Bob Roller
Bob, I don't understand this one bit.
In the 1820s, American rifles were generally very long, fullstock, smallish caliber, pinned barrels, fixed breeches, with sideplates.
1820s English rifles were 31" big bores, halfstock, wedges and very often two wedges, standing breeches, side escutcheons, and scroll trigger guards.
We know from crescent butts and DS triggers that many Americans were shooting "schuetzen style", cross body from the upper arm, and carefully. I don't accept that Americans were impaling their chests on crescent plates. Frankly, it's borderline as preposterous as mounting a schuetzen buttplate to the chest.
How many fowlers have buttplates like a Hawken? Honest question. Imagine flushing a grouse and jamming that buttplate into your chest. Rifles weren't being held like fowlers. If the crescent plate were just rakish fashion, it would be as common on fowlers.
The English seemed to prefer their rifles set up like fowlers, quick to mount to the shoulder pocket.
The classic Hawken looks to me like nothing more than an English rifle set up for people who shoot deliberately, cross body with set triggers. It's like saying "That car looks just like a Jaguar, and has a V12, and the hood ornament is some kind of big cat, but it can't be a Jaguar because the steering wheel is on the left side." The Hawken, to me, is basically an American-market ESR with crescent and set triggers.