To follow on bgf's comments, I’ll say that I definitely get a certain kind of enjoyment of making things out of junk. I do understand the suggestion some of the guys have made that we might save time and frustration by starting with 1095 or some other known quantity. And for many of us here, time really is money. So the suggestion to use 1095 is understandable.
At the same time, for some of us, there is something particularly enjoyable about working with scrap. It’s not just that we are cheap skates. It’s because the activity gives us a certain sort of satisfaction. And it's not that we always work with scrap, but when do make something cool out of some piece of junk, it gives us the feeling (imagined as it may be) that we are approaching in some manner the mechanical mastery required of the old smiths (even if we never reach their level of artistic mastery). For some of the guys on here, the joy of building a firearm is closely related to their sense of mastery of that process and those skills. We could reshape a piece of 1095, but that’s not the point. We want to develop the skill required to make that thing out of a piece of broken saw blade, or a worn out file, or a piece of a pitch fork tine—we want to do it like the old guys did (or at least like we imagine they did it).
We imagine, at least, that this sort of cleverness was required of many early American gunsmiths and blacksmiths. It was probably required of some more than others, depending on their access to quality materials. But we do see it in certain anecdotes and collections, such as the anecdotes told about Tennessee gunsmith, Hacker Martin (see Foxfire 5, 1979). And the collections of tools, etc. that John Rice Irwin documents in his Guns and Gunmaking Tools of Southern Appalachia (1980, 1983), made from files and various pieces of salvaged metal. Those collections of tools are not valuable for the reason of representing superior craftsmanship. They are valuable for more nostalgic, even philosophical reasons. It’s because of the clever, creative spirit that they represent.
This is not to put off on or criticize anyone who doesn’t share that interest. It’s just to identify with those who do.