Small patch is quite right to emphasize the thread count. If we are talking about safety, then thread count is the main issue.
Modern plugs as sold are quite long. And breeches as sold on most barrels are quite long. There are two reasons why they are long. The first is liability—safety from the perspective of lawyers. The second is thread relief. Threads that have been relieved are no longer there. So, (talking only about simple plugs here) a long plug that has been relieved is basically a short plug with two useless bits of metal on either end, doing nothing other than serving as an unfortunate reason to move the touch hole forward (or the breech end of the barrel and tang backward, depending on how you look at it.)
In other words, if you are happy to use a long breech plug, then maybe you can afford to loose some of the threads to thread relief.
That said, if you want a shorter breech overall, so as to approach something more like the architecture of the old guns and still maintain a healthy margin of safety, then you need to carefully consider thread count. A shorter plug has fewer threads, and so every thread becomes important.
So, once we have established that there are enough good threads for safety, then the remaining issue is all about architecture. Moving the touch hole forward in relation to the tang ultimately affects architecture.
What we don’t want is a short plug with missing threads. Whether a guy is using a long plug with thread relief, or a short plug with full threads, either way we want to see an appropriate number of good threads making full contact. And we want to see the face of the plug mating up fully with the shoulder inside the hole, etc., just as smallpatch mentioned.