This is risky. It's at least approaching political. If it crosses the line, my apologies.
Often we criticize game departments for what some see as screwy game regs vis a vis muzzleloaders and hunting. I don't know about your state, but where I've lived, it's been hunters and shooters AND THEIR ORGANIZATIONS that have lobbied and testified when these regs were being written. We may think roundball and loose powder when we see specific caliber delineations for hunting, but others are thinking saboted jacketed bullets powered by various non traditional propellants. If the development of these regs was politicized, it was done by ostensibly non- or a-political organizations and individuals providing testimony and other input in creating these laws and regulations. In my experience, there were axes ground left, right, and center in the process. Some states did better than others, in my opinion, but where I may think a better job was done, others don't like the outcome.
You can please all of the people some of the time, and some...