Before I wrote this response to “HIB’s” comments above, I spoke with him personally to try to be sure that my response did not create an unpleasant, inflamed and/or inappropriate debate here between us and/or others. The core issue, as I understand it, is the unscrupulous “forger” of barrel signatures and by unknowingly perpetuating “already faked” signatures by presenting digital photographed barrel signatures that could mislead future stewards….to a lesser extent the same can be said of patchboxes.
CERTAINLY BOTH VALID POINTS TO BE RESPECTED. HOWEVER, our goal has always been educational and promotional of the stewardship of these Artifacts of American History and Art…and it will remain so.
I personally am reluctant to acquiesce to the “faker/forger” reality of the few, placing at risk the education, knowledge, sharing and appreciation of those in the vast majority that have integrity. In fact , I reflect on the recent discussions of the issues of “honest reproduction” ( hopefully a contemporary maker signed bench copy) and well intended restoration of respected masterpieces and their effects on the originals value.
Reminded that today, the internet auctions and our own ALR Museum library contains hundreds of digital photos of signatures ( all presented with the permission of the owners), I have personally decided to continue to offer this effort to those who wish to add, teach or learn in this way. Please continue to send us photos to post for ALL to view and learn.
Two lessons to be learned by all:
Before buying, get “expert “ opinions before investing!!!
Test the barrel signature with your finger. If it is “sharp”, it is not likely old or original. The same be true of any metal engraving, perhaps an incised wood carving too.
Hurricane (Fred)
