Author Topic: Cleaning Original Longrifle?  (Read 45380 times)

Offline vtbuck223

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 154
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #50 on: June 18, 2015, 02:36:31 AM »
I really  appreciate the responses and the willingness to engage in a discussion about something that you all are obviously so passionate about.  After looking again at the full length "after" picture....I realized that it is a very poor picture in terms of lighting and color.  It was taken outside...full sun...light background...etc.  So...yes...the wood is darker than the before picture taken years ago when I got the longrifle...as I said I crossed that bridge long ago....However...it is not as dark as that picture portrays.  So...I just pulled it off the wall and took these...not great pictures either but more accurate in terms of  the color of wood....

 

Offline Buck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
  • A.F.A.M. # 934, Trinity Commandry #80
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2015, 02:47:09 AM »
Looks like you cleaned the fence up with it!
Buck

wet willy

  • Guest
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #52 on: June 18, 2015, 03:15:32 AM »
I'll second "whenever one does something that cannot be undone then the antique is probably devalued".
If you want expert advice on restoration, I'd suggest contacting your state or city historical museum/society, tell them you are restoring a wood and brass item, ask for advice.

Generally, they are happy to work with you and you have a certified, credentialed expert in the field to speak to. They will help you stabilize the rifle, prevent further deterioration, perhaps some light cleaning.

They may ask you to join/contribute, but it will be worthwhile to get their advice.

 

Offline mr. no gold

  • member 2
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2654
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #53 on: June 18, 2015, 03:20:42 AM »
VT, it's your gun and you have done as you pleased with it; your right by possession. Nonetheless, it seems that your sense of humor has gone astray. My comments were in the way of humorous satire, and not based on imagination, but on actual fact. I cleaned several pieces before I wised up, but fortunately found someone who could undo the worst of it all. I simply described the worst scenario that one could  imagine.

Guess that what now rubs me wrong about this is that you came here , somewhat humbly, ostensibly seeking guidance, got answers and then gloatingly ignored good advice given. I regard that as an affront to the experts who spoke up for your edification and it shows a lack of respect. You have received comments from some who have unparalleled collections and from some who are master restorers. It appears that that you have treated them cavalierly.

We are all very happy to share our knowledge gained over many decades of study and collecting and that includes not only the pieces, but their condition as well; what sells and what don't.

If this over the top, so be it. Not the first time I have been there.
Dick

Offline Karl Kunkel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 977
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #54 on: June 18, 2015, 05:08:35 AM »
Dick,

I own no original pieces. I can barely afford to build the occasional contemporary.  I do love to study the originals.

I understand "black" guns are currently what collectors covet.  Would an original piece that remained 'in the family" so to speak, and was cared for over the years preventing the development of extreme tarnish/verdigris/oxidation be worth less to collectors than a virgin original attic find?

I'm not casting aspersions either way, this is just my own curiosity on the subject.

Kunk
Kunk

Offline vtbuck223

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 154
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #55 on: June 18, 2015, 05:26:44 AM »
Mr. No Gold.....as I have stated repeatedly...(where is the beating the dead horse guy?)....I have followed the advice of people on this site....evidently those who don't agree with you! I don't believe that I damaged my rifle by using Howard's Feed N Wax....and doing a light cleaning of the metal parts....if I did...I wouldn't have done it! And yes...I am happy with my rifle....not arrogance....just the truth....(again...where is beating the dead horse guy?).

I will say....the contradictions of some on this site...are numerous, interesting, and not talked about.

As far as my sense of humor.....sorry....but satire is only funny when it is clever!

Moderators can certainly leave the post open...but I will not be participating further.

Offline JTR

  • member 2
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #56 on: June 18, 2015, 06:07:42 AM »
Kunk, It's not the 'black' that counts, but the original condition, whatever it might be.

vt, the few collectors that commented suggested you do nothing to the gun.
I don't see where anyone suggested using Howards, although I do see where you mentioned that you had been using it regularly. There was a suggestion of something called Kramers. I wrote about my experience with Murphy's wood oil soap, as a caution to you to be wary.

I expect the mods will lock this thread as they don't like differences of opinion, even if something good can be learned from those varying opinions.

In the long run, it's your gun, and if you like it cleaned that's what counts to you.

A funny thing, here, usually, when someone does something to a gun, the usual guys chime in with the usual comments that the owner was just trying to improve the value of the gun!

I hope you stick around the forum, and I hope we get to see more of your guns. And if you do, just remember that like every forum out there, everyone has an opinion, and that some opinions are more valid than others, depending on the subject.

John

PS, If you have a good picture of the patchbox side of the butt stock, I'd like to see it.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2015, 06:10:34 AM by JTR »
John Robbins

Offline WadePatton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5303
  • Tennessee
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #57 on: June 18, 2015, 08:38:39 AM »
I find the thread a fantastic illustration of what typically happens when someone tries to "clean up" any historic artifact. 

I am no seasoned collector, but an interested bystander at this point-for the qualification of my comments. 

Let me ask this of the seasoned collectors here gathered, to what extent has the value of the gun been diminished in your opinion?  Assume it was "perfect black" untouched for a max of 10, and now it's dropped to what level on that 10-scale?  (not that the subject gun is/was or will ever be for sale, but that others might be reminded of the "damage" that can be done-especially if "trading" is in the cards.)

No doubt it raised the value of the existing "black guns" by removing one from that limited field, making it smaller.

Thanks for playing nicely.  ;D
Hold to the Wind

Offline E.vonAschwege

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3118
    • von Aschwege Flintlocks
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #58 on: June 18, 2015, 07:17:06 PM »
John,

The moderators do not remove, edit or lock topics because members express differences of opinion.  To the contrary, many threads contain just that, with no harm, no foul, just a civil exchange of ideas and opinions.

What we will remove, among other things, is:
3.  Any personal attack or personal criticism of another member of the message board.  You can criticize an idea but not a person.  There will be zero tolerance for this infraction.

6.  Any comments that can reasonably be expected to provoke an extreme emotional  response by other board members.  

(Source, ALR Policies http://www.americanlongrifles.org/american-longrifles-privacy-policy-2.htm )

Several replies in this thread have come very close, if not outright violating these rules.  Though there are a few unanswered questions along similar lines, the original topic has run its course.  Perhaps it would be best to lock this topic.

-The ALR Moderators
« Last Edit: June 18, 2015, 07:18:44 PM by E.vonAschwege »
Former Gunsmith, Colonial Williamsburg www.vonaschwegeflintlocks.com

Offline WadePatton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5303
  • Tennessee
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #59 on: June 18, 2015, 09:36:07 PM »
Not to be arrogant, but with more pictures, ( mentioned it was posted somehwere??) perhaps someone will trade you a similar "cleaned one" for yours in the "black"? As mentioned many times, "in the black" is hard to find. Seriously, but just another idea.
Hurricane

This, in retrospect is/was a fantastic idea.  Wonder how we could get this word out to the great masses (ha!) of guys with "in the black" guns such that they could likely trade "UP" for a fancier and shinier original gun and let the "in the blacks" continue to exist, be preserved, appreciated, and studied?  Win/win is how that sounds to this pilgrim.   
Hold to the Wind

Offline Don Stith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2815
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #60 on: June 19, 2015, 04:26:36 PM »
If you can stand  a jump into the 21st century, there is a good presentation on why not to use Homer Feed and wax, and other such on gunstocks over on RimfireCentral.com/forums. Scroll down to the "Shooting related" section and look for Stocks: Making, repairing etc. The article you want is in the "stickeys" section at the top of that forum

Offline Shreckmeister

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3808
  • GGGG Grandpa Schrecengost Gunsmith/Miller
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #61 on: June 19, 2015, 06:10:38 PM »
I'm really on the fence on this " in the black" being the best examples of original longrifles and to be cherished above others.  Not sure I
get why a rifle that is black with accumulation of dirt and tarnish should have a greater value than a rifle that has been kept clean for
generations by people who cared about it.  A rifle that has been left in the barn or rafters for decades for the elements to deteriorate is just
not that appealing to me.  In my quest for my family rifles, I have now seen about 60 examples ranging from 120 to 170 years old.
Yes, one guy took brillo to the rifle in anticipation of it being viewed so that it would be pretty and shiny, but I have seen dozens of rifles
that had original finish that had been kept clean and brass with a nice caramel color to it.  I prefer it over not being able to see the
engraving with wood that is half dry rotten.  Are we next going to see some great rifles artificially aged to increase their values?  After that
will great Winchesters be likewise aged to increase their values.  The guy I bought the best example of my family guns from, kept it in a
safe and for 50 years, took it out and waxed it and his other great guns every year.  He had inherited an unbelievably fine collection of
guns from his grandfather including about 25 cased Colt pistols including 3 Tiffany's.  None of them were black.
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

Offline WadePatton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5303
  • Tennessee
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #62 on: June 19, 2015, 06:11:32 PM »
Thanks Don. Although I'm already sold on the "less, if any, is more" school on the subject am interested to see what I might learn. 

Here's a quicker route: http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=3b0ed29092d49e6133e14a36f94ffab8&f=275

+++

I hear you Shreck, but as I am understanding it's not really the gunk or blackness (trends do happen) but the "original as found" condition that enhances interest/value.  So gunking up a clean (well-kept) original would certainly depreciate  that gun as much or more than brightening up a dark one.

  
« Last Edit: June 19, 2015, 09:09:07 PM by WadePatton »
Hold to the Wind

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19522
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #63 on: June 19, 2015, 06:37:29 PM »
You nailed it Wade. It is guns kept in as found condition that are most valued because one can read the history of use. Doesn't matter if found in pristine condition or in blackened condition; tge value is preserved by not altering whatever remaibs of finish or lack thereof. It is the preservation of whatever finish, patina, wear etc that enables the gun to tell its story. My understanding of current best practice is to stabilize an antique, retain current finish, and only do restoration steps that could be undone.

But each owner obviously has the right to do as they please. And it's helpful to understand that standards and best practices change over time and obviously each generation thinks they are doing it right. Think every rifle in Kindig was somehow found clean and complete in flintlock condition?
Andover, Vermont

Offline Shreckmeister

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3808
  • GGGG Grandpa Schrecengost Gunsmith/Miller
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #64 on: June 19, 2015, 07:03:55 PM »
That term "Found" has interesting connotations.  I love these articles on the internet that say a collection of rare corvettes was found in a barn.
In my mind they werent found, unless they were dug out of the ground.  Somebody always knew where they were.  Does found mean discovered
in a closet and brought to the collecting market by someone outside the collecting world? 
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19522
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #65 on: June 19, 2015, 07:11:35 PM »
As found, as purchased, whatever best applies.  One cannot undo some work that was done before. I think in this discussion we started with a rifle that appeared to never have been cleaned or restored until the current owner obtained it. So some comments reflect  that particular circumstance.
Andover, Vermont

Offline JTR

  • member 2
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #66 on: June 19, 2015, 07:21:14 PM »
'Black' is just a term, meaning original condition.

What I'd like to hear is how you do a restoration that can be undone? Seems a bit of a conundrum to me....

Don, Thanks for the rimfire forum link. Interesting stuff from my old hobby there!

John
« Last Edit: June 19, 2015, 07:51:23 PM by JTR »
John Robbins

Offline WadePatton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5303
  • Tennessee
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #67 on: June 19, 2015, 09:15:52 PM »
That term "Found" has interesting connotations. 

In these rural parts folks die, people move away, families split up, things are indeed sometimes found that were forgotten or especially in a the case of a long-outmoded gun-stashed away with no record, then later discovered by someone else.

But mostly I take it mean that the item hasn't been tampered with for quite some time.  Certainly hasn't been on display or in a collection and wiped down with regularity, or of course, "cleaned up".

Hold to the Wind

Offline Majorjoel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3138
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #68 on: June 20, 2015, 09:45:42 PM »
When it comes to finding old historic Kentucky longrifle's, we pretty much have to either take em or leave em on the grounds of our own personal likes or dislikes.  As rare as they are to run across, I have been known to quickly rethink my ideas as to what a perfect specimen should look like!!  Seeing so many of the "Classics" in the newest full color books we have today, it appears that quite the few have been polished to the hilt. We also have to remember that is what was done by many of the collectors of the early 20th century.  I have noticed the noses in the air when the word "restoration" has been associated with an old Kentucky and to me it is unjustified many times when a piece has had the professional care taken with fine work to put an old relic back into the realm of fine art.   
Joel Hall

Offline mr. no gold

  • member 2
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2654
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #69 on: June 20, 2015, 11:30:50 PM »
Karl, I will make an attempt to answer your question with this posting. Collectors basically can be divided into two groups: those who are generalists and there are the specialists. Among the latter you will encounter Colt, Winchester, European, Kentucky, Military collectors, et al who oftentimes pare down their interests into unbelievable increments. And, they spend huge sums to get the best.

Without getting into further descriptions of those who may collect only mint Winchesters, Colts, or whatever, each group seem to have its own standards: e.g. serious Colt collectors will not give any consideration to a gun that has had any restoration whatsoever, including a replaced screw, grips, restored barrel, mixed numbers or any refinishing. Same with the Winchester/Henry folks. Of course it is not too hard to see how counterfeits have appeared which are perfect to supply the demand. The Military collectors are much the same: no restocks, no fore stock replacement, no reconversions, or refinishing. Pretty exacting standards!

The Kentucky collectors are pretty much a different lot. The Kentucky of legend was made during difficult times and most were used hard and put away dirty. Many were used in the westward movment and sad to say, most appear today as though they had been dragged behind the Connestoga wagon, rather than riding in it. You find all kinds of 'alterations and abberations' in them; barrels cut down, conversion to percussion, silver inlays missing, broken stocks, missing wood, and on, and on. So, finding a truly good piece is not as easy as going into the gun shop and buying a Glock. Good, fully original Ky Rifles tend to be quite scarce; not that they aren't around, they are. You just have to be there when one becomes available and have the where with all to acquire it.

There is a fair supply of the 'hurt' pieces needing work though, and this is where less demanding collectors can get into the game. Attend gun shows, estate sales, auctions, junk shops, or any other sales venues where old things are available. Something will show up. If this happens in San Diego, believe me when I say that you can depend that it will in your area. So. Cal is Colt and Winchester Country and very few KY Rifle came through, but still and all, they do show up infrequently.

So, collectors came to the position that a good rifle if in terrible condition can be brought back with careful effort it would be worth having. The first attempt seemed to involve reconversions and Keith Neubauer was one of the pioneers in ensuring that the new parts fit the time period and the style that worked with a particular gun. He went on from there to repairing broken stocks, adding missing wood, inlays and 'stretching' barrels and fore stocks. The results convinced collectors that restoration was a pretty good idea after all. In fact, many great guns have come back into the fold as a result of the efforts of superb artisans we have with us today. To name a few, Louie Parker, John (jtr), Jack Brooks, Brian LaMaster, and there are others as well who do what often seems to be a miracle with wood and metal to bring a badly treated, but good gun back. A well restored gun should look like it has had nothing done to it at all. There should be no mark that betrays the modern hand. It is possible to bring back a good aged appearance as well, but those processes seem to be closely guarded trade secrets. To maintain honesty, all restoration work records should be revealed at time of sale.

I know that this has run on somewhat, but it is kind of a loose history of collecting as I lived it, and recall it today. I know many collectors of Kentucky Rifles and no one I know turns a well restored gun away. Prices may fluctuate a bit between pristine pieces and those having some restoration, but that is reasonable. The pristing gun is one which is in the 'black, attic, or closet' condition, showing that long term storage by virtue of its surface color. Hence, 'in the black'. A gun from the safe or wall rack rubbed down occasionally over the decades will lack the dirt, but will nonetheless retain a smooth patina or mellow color that is not shiny, or which has noticable highlights. The stock will have color, or may even be dry looking. The silver will have likely have a dull appearance. To maintain this, I lay down a single coat of good cabinet maker's wax on metal and wood to avoid fingerprinting, or moisture and that seems to work fine.

As I said earlier, the collectors I know, and I do know a bunch, like to find that untouched gem and they prize its condition very highly. Guess that when the subject of this discussion showed up, it sped up a lot of pulse rates among those who would have liked to own it as well. Then, when it comes back as a cleaned gun and that done in what seems to a hap-hazard manner, it certainly attracted everyone's attention. Sorry that VT found the reactions not to his liking, but he still owns what is a fine, fine rifle and to be frank, the patina is not all gone and will come back over time, or can be repaired by one of the great restorers. I think that we were all in shock over it, and based our comments on that. I do hope that he forgives us and stays in the ranks.

Sorry to run on here, but I tend to do that. Thought that these reflections might be of interest to some of you. Karl, hope that this answers your basic question.
Dick
     

Offline Dr. Tim-Boone

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6538
  • I Like this hat!!
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #70 on: June 21, 2015, 01:46:29 AM »
Thanks Dick. The calm discussion is helpful. I too hope VTBUCK will stay with us.
De Oppresso Liber
Marietta, GA

Liberty is the only thing you cannot have unless you are willing to give it to others. – William Allen White

Learning is not compulsory...........neither is survival! - W. Edwards Deming

Offline Karl Kunkel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 977
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #71 on: June 21, 2015, 07:18:42 AM »
Dick,

Thanks for taking the time for such a detailed response.

Kunk
Kunk

Offline WadePatton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5303
  • Tennessee
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #72 on: June 21, 2015, 07:55:59 AM »
Muchas gracias, and I'm going to share that with some other folks such that maybe a rifle or two gets spared.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2015, 08:30:15 AM by WadePatton »
Hold to the Wind

Offline jdm

  • member 2
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #73 on: June 22, 2015, 01:47:49 AM »
Dick,
 Your response echo's the sentiments of a number of collectors . I appreciated your taking the time  you obviously   did with it.
I might add that in the case of Colts , Winchesters and other mass produced guns . There are sometimes thousands to choose from. In the case of Kentucky's  very few in comparison . Sometimes there are only one or two known by a certain maker. It makes untouched more important in studying there work.

VTBUCK, I hope you hang in there and forgive our passion. WE have all been in your shoes . I have enjoyed your posts and seeing what you dig up.   JIM
JIM

Offline smart dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7013
Re: Cleaning Original Longrifle?
« Reply #74 on: June 24, 2015, 11:49:36 PM »
Hi,
This is really a great thread and I've learned a lot.  I think I finally understand the desire for "in the black".  However, how do collectors reconcile the possibility that accumulated dirt and crud may obscure important marks and features that provide important historical information about a gun?  For example, barrel markings, lock markings, engraving, etc.

dave 
"The main accomplishment of modern economics is to make astrology look good."