Whew, now that I am sober, I should amend what I was trying to say about posting photos.
Whether you use Photobucket or a website with integral photoloading capability, you still have to go through the same process of uploading, archiving and getting the URL address of every photo you want to use.
Several good things about photobucket:
You have your own album, which you manage the appearance and storage of your photos into folders.
You can take any of your photo URL addresses and include this in an e-mail, or website, or any other forum, and folks can view your pictures.
Photobucket has changed their upload procedure, making it a little easier to load your photos into.
PhotoBucket is free, and I have hundreds of photos, and have never run out of space to date. I make sure my photos are small before uploading to PhotoBucket, which does TWO things: 1) speeds uploading, and 2) enables more photos to be stored without maxing out my free account.
There are other online image storage services like Photobucket, they are not the only game in town. I have never experienced a problem with the service, and appreciate what they do very much.
If you have your own web site, you can store all your photos there, and provide the appropriate URL links to your photos stored there. One problem I have noticed when folks use their own photoalbum is when they reorganize their website, the link to their photo is broken, and the image no longer appears in the post.