Author Topic: Monte Mandarino  (Read 3297 times)

Offline Seth Isaacson

  • Library_mod
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1104
  • Send me your rifles for the ALR Library!
    • Black Powder Historian
Monte Mandarino
« on: January 07, 2019, 06:44:19 PM »
http://americanlongrifles.org/forum/index.php?topic=52378.0 This topic still has me itching to see more of Mr. Mandarino's work. The little I have seen has been very impressive. Anyone have more images of guns by him? Very little seems to be available online.
I am the Lead Historian/Firearms Specialist at Rock Island Auction Co., but I am here out of my own personal interests in muzzle loading and history.
*All opinions expressed are mine alone and are NOT meant to represent those of any other entity unless otherwise expressly stated.*

Offline smart dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7013
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2019, 10:35:58 PM »
Hi,
Consensus on that thread is that the mark is not Monte Mandarino but Mark Bokencamp.  Mandarino's work is exceptional and the only place I have seen multiple examples is in Weir's book on contemporary muzzleloading gunmakers.

dave
"The main accomplishment of modern economics is to make astrology look good."

Offline sqrldog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2019, 01:06:29 AM »
RH it would take some digging but there was an article on Mandarino in a Muzzle Blasts years back. Cover photo was one of the most spectacular fowlers I've seen. Tim

Offline mtlonghunter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2019, 02:47:38 AM »
Get a copy of Steel Canvas. It has a half a dozen of Monty^s guns to look at.

Offline Seth Isaacson

  • Library_mod
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1104
  • Send me your rifles for the ALR Library!
    • Black Powder Historian
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2019, 09:45:10 PM »
Thanks guys I’ll check those out. For such a well-respected maker, it is surprisingly hard to view his work.
I am the Lead Historian/Firearms Specialist at Rock Island Auction Co., but I am here out of my own personal interests in muzzle loading and history.
*All opinions expressed are mine alone and are NOT meant to represent those of any other entity unless otherwise expressly stated.*

Offline smokinbuck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2019, 08:46:52 PM »
Dave,
I knew Mark Bokencamp when he lived in Delaware Ohio and he was an excellent blacksmith but I don't remember ever seeing a rifles that he built.
Mark
Mark

Offline smylee grouch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7907
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2019, 12:25:15 AM »
I had the good fortune of meeting Monte Mandarino  when traveling through Kalispell  Mt several years ago right after he finished that French fouler that was showcased in The American Rifleman magazine. A true masterpiece of a gun and a true master in the highest sense is Mr. Mandarino.

Offline Jim Kibler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4473
    • Personal Website
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2019, 12:31:36 AM »
Still the best.

Offline smart dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7013
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2019, 01:09:05 AM »
Dave,
I knew Mark Bokencamp when he lived in Delaware Ohio and he was an excellent blacksmith but I don't remember ever seeing a rifles that he built.
Mark
Hi Mark,
If you read the following thread that I referred to your question will be answered.

http://americanlongrifles.org/forum/index.php?topic=52378.0

dave
"The main accomplishment of modern economics is to make astrology look good."

Offline smokinbuck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Monte Mandarino
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2019, 04:42:33 PM »
Dave,
Couldn't find the reference to Mark but the majority says that you are right. Knew him as a blacksmith, one of the best, but did not know him as a gun maker. Thanks for the correction.
Mark
Mark