Rich,
It would be innacurate to say "my methods echo those from the past". Some do, but as a blanket statement this would not be appropriate. For example as you pointed out, "JP Beck or Andrew Verner or George Schroyer or Isaac Berlin had 1200 pound benches with ball vises on them". I choose my words carefully and don't like it when they are twisted, especially in an attempt to make a point. And please take note, I said previously that a bench this heavy is not necessary for stability and to produce good work.
Yes, I use lights, some power tools, a cast iron bench, etc. that are not period appropriate. Some advances have been made since the 18th century and I have no problem taking advantage of them. The point that I have been working hard to make is that many basic techniques that work well today also by no coincidence worked well in the period. Every method is not good and not everybody should get a ribbon for trying in my world! Further, you will find a general concensus in basic techniques and approaches amongst widely respected builders today. I think you get my point. No need to further subject everybody else to this nonsense.
DWS,
Yes, I understand your point. We all have to make due with the best we have. The good thing is that not a great deal is an absolute necesity. I started building guns in a tiny room that was maybe 6'x8' or less, in my parents basement. The bench T. Caster showed might be a good example for someone working under limiting circumstances. From appearances, much lighter and less rigid than I would want, but undoubtably works as evidenced by the guns T. Caster has built.
Jim
