Just my opinion, but for the life of me I have no idea why anyone would compare a Euro made firearm to a similar period American firearm.
First of all, the construction methods couldn’t have been further apart. The Euro guns were made by various Guild members where one guy made a screw, another guy made parts for a lock, another guy put it together, another guy cast the brass parts, another guy made the barrel, another guy inlet the stock, another guy did the carving, another guy did the engraving, another guy did the finishing on the wood and another guy did the finishing on the metal, etc. And all these guys were making a gun for the local King or Prince or Land Baron as a toy to entertain him….
So why don’t American made guns have touch hole liners? You might as well ask why they don’t have gold encrusted locks and barrels as well.
Let’s guess and say the local Euro tyrant made say a hundred thousand coins of the realm annually, so a thousand coin gun was a drop in the bucket to him! And if for some reason he didn’t have the coins, he could just raise the rent on his peasants.
Then you have the American longrifle gunsmith (that’s what they called themselves back then, as opposed to now) working in a one man shop…. Or maybe he had an apprentice, or if he was really lucky, had two. Maybe he made the barrel or maybe he bought it. Same with the lock depending on time period and the gunsmiths locality. Maybe the apprentice did the initial inletting, but the gunsmith did the rest. Did the carving, did the inlays, did the engraving, basically building all, or the vast majority of the gun in his shop. And yes, true, probably without a touch hole liner….
But of course, the American gunsmith didn’t have a King or Prince or Land Baron as a client to sell his gun to. He had for the most part what in a Euro context might be considered a Free Peasant. Probably most these free peasant American farmers made 50 or a 100 bucks a year from his corn or whatever crop, so the gunsmith was stuck selling his gun for 8 or 10 bucks.
So the American farmers might have spent about 10 percent of annual income on a longrifle, vs 1/10 a percent of the Kings income for his gold crusted play thing.
But somehow the American guy was cheap because he didn’t see the need for a touch hole liner?
Let’s see, in a modern comparison, say you drive a Chevy pickup, and well, I drive a wonderful Euro made Ferrari,,,, but somehow you’re cheap because you drive a Chevy?
Maybe instead of criticizing the poor old American Long rifle for not being more like the Kings or Prince’s or Land Barons guns, perhaps we should celebrate the longrifle for being as good as it was…..
John