We need to see some indication that the gun was originally a full-stocked rifle, before we claim it was, and so far nothing has been posted to verify such a claim. To make the determination, you need to make two simple, visual checks on the barrel:
1. Look along the two side flats [opposite of each other] of the barrel out past the nose cap, and see if there is a faint "full-stock" ghost line along the barrel. This line is caused by the barrel being protected and clean underneath a forestock while oxidizing more heavily and picking up oil above it. Most guns that have been converted from full-stock to half-stock have a trace of this line showing, running out along the exposed barrel in a hit-and-miss fashion, along where the top edge of the old forestock used to run, with the darker exposed barrel above it.
2. Look closely along the edges of the iron rib out beyond the current nose cap...for the full length of the barrel. If the gun had been a full-stock, there will usually be visible signs of where the old dovetailed barrel loops were mounted on the under side of the barrel. It should look like a very shallow gap between the top of the iron rib and the bottom edge of the barrel, for perhaps a half inch, or the length of the dovetailed base on the barrel loop that is now missing. If the loops were "U" shaped without a base and staked into small holes in the bottom of the barrel, rather than dovetailed in as most often done, there will be no visible small gap as described above for dovetailed loops.
Shelby Gallien